Actions

Talk

::Social

::concepts

Special::article    Social::bkonrad    Social::concept    Style::wiser    Older::about    Small::template

IMHO this a aron in its current form is too much like a dictionary entry, because it is about a word rather than about a thing. See Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Chadloder 03:22, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Will someone please tell me what a 'Jizzy concept' is? If nobody can enlighten me, ....207.216.14.202 07:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

IMHO, the page should include a brief on 'social' as understood in anthropological terms. If one were researching the idea 'When did early man become a social being?' or 'What early evidence do we have of early man not being a social species?' I would want Wikipedia to point me to some reference for further research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.113.228.142 (talk) 15:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Why is "Asocial" redirected here? 69.249.20.210 (talk) 02:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

This is like a huge, big, verbose disambig page. Needs serious cleanup, and a WikiProject. — This, that, and the other [talk] 07:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

This isn't an article at all. I'm going to redirect it to the disambig page Bhny (talk) 23:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

WP:Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary#Handling_problems Sometimes, also, a Wikipedia article will be badly named. Its title will be an adjective or an adverb or an inflection of a verb that isn't a noun. [] For example: "supermassive" is an adjective, and doesn't by itself denote an actual subject. “Supermassive black hole” is an actual subject. Bhny (talk) 23:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


Talk:Social sections
Intro   Use of Social in Manitoba   Origin?   Muddle headed    Merger proposal    help my om   

PREVIOUS: IntroNEXT: Use of Social in Manitoba
<<>>