The bottom of this page suggests several relevant links, one of which is "Pseudoscience." (Or maybe that is an example of subtle cyber vandalism?)
In any event, that is a pretty harsh editorial decision. There are more than a few "science" articles on Wikipedia for which I would like to provide that link, but will refrain from doing so.
Of course, any text will have a non-neutral point of view or it wouldn't be worth reading! So I don't really fault Wikipedia for that- only for dishonestly claiming that neutrality is possible.
184.108.40.206 (talk) 08:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- I assume you mean it is not neutral because it is an internal link. Remember Wikipedia is "the free encyclopedia that almost anyone can edit." Hyacinth (talk) 06:04, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Intro Sound Not A Wave Image Context? Science? Standing waves Slashdot link New Discoveries in Cymatics Medical Aspects Article needs revision Pseudoscience visible sound co vibration
|PREVIOUS: Intro||NEXT: Sound Not A Wave|