Actions

Talk

Crap::Adult-onset immunodeficiency syndrome

::concepts

Wakari::august    Fentener::article    Disease::about    Started::descent    Context::study    Think::articles

Crap This article is clearly crap, but my changes were reverted. Why? Biosthmors (talk) 20:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Can somebody else answer this if needed? Wakari07 (talk) 20:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
You made the revert, so you are supposed discuss it. Biosthmors (talk) 20:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Look, the core text stands as commonly developed in August 23rd's current events. That's one of the few things that channel thought it knew for sure, besides that it exists. So please don't destroy the fruit of daylong, well-referenced work here on a whim. We need fundamental disambiguation, it's good that you started the discussion. Wakari07 (talk) 20:37, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
I don't know what you mean by disambiguation. I think an article should exist on the disease. Wikipedia is meant to be edited by anyone, and our medical articles are to follow WP:MEDRS and WP:MEDMOS. That's why I made the changes I did. Biosthmors (talk) 20:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Well, apparently we agree that we talk about the same disease. But is it sound to base us on only one study that clearly identifies the disease? I don't say it's a US or a Russian creation at all. I only suggest thematic correspondence to help create context (which is what enables to disambiguate in peace afterwards). Wakari07 (talk) 20:45, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Adult-onset immunodeficiency syndrome sections
Intro   Name of the article    Factual accuracy    why is this a military stub?    Crap    First diagnose    Genotype    Primary or not immunodeficiency    An \"elevated\" or a \"more frequent\" IFN-\u03b3 production in patients?    Concept cloud   

Crap
PREVIOUS: IntroNEXT: Name of the article
<<>>