Innate and adventitious ideas::Idea


Ideas::which    ''idea''::ideas    Etext::virginia    Www-dhi::specfile    Query::english    Texts::offset

Innate and adventitious ideas {{#invoke:main|main}} One view on the nature of ideas is that there exist some ideas (called innate ideas) which are so general and abstract that they could not have arisen as a representation of any object of our perception, but rather were in some sense always present. These are distinguished from adventitious ideas which are images or concepts which are accompanied by the judgment that they are caused or occasioned by an external object.<ref name="Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy"/>

Another view holds that we only discover ideas in the same way that we discover the real world, from personal experiences. The view that humans acquire all or almost all their behavioral traits from nurture (life experiences) is known as tabula rasa ("blank slate"). Most of the confusions in the way ideas arise at least in part from the use of the term "idea" to cover both the representation percept and the object of conceptual thought. This can be illustrated in terms of the doctrines of innate ideas, "concrete ideas versus abstract ideas", as well as "simple ideas versus complex ideas".<ref>The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 1973 ISBN 0-02-894950-1 ISBN 978-0-02-894950-5 Vol 4: 120–121</ref>

Idea sections
Intro  Etymology  Innate and adventitious ideas  Philosophy  In anthropology and the social sciences  Semantics  Relationship of ideas to modern legal time- and scope-limited monopolies  See also  Notes  References  Bibliography  

Innate and adventitious ideas
PREVIOUS: EtymologyNEXT: Philosophy