Actions

Talk

Replaced page after deletion::While

::concepts

Whilst::while    Style::article    Small::special    English::while    Which::would    Should::archaic

Replaced page after deletion Someone deleted this page, which has been stable for over seven years. Such a deletion warrants a consensus via poll. The information covered here is not in Wiktionary. At the very least, the page should be migrated to a While vs. Whilst page if the consensus is that that information predominates the section. Shiggity (talk) 22:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

There is no encyclopedic knowledge here, it's all about the term, when the term 'should' and shouldn't be used, it's pure dictionary land. Encyclopedic knowledge starts where terminology stops. - BigBodBad (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Talk:While sections
Intro  [[Talk:While?section=_Utter_nonsense_interpretation_of_The_Times_and_The_Guardian_style_guides_| Utter nonsense interpretation of The Times and The Guardian style guides ]]   Multiple Choice    Usage    My idiolect    \"While and whilst\" section    Use of \"while\" to mean \"until\"   The English/American conflict   a different angle    Replaced page after deletion    Thee and Thou    Sources & anti-whilst snobbery    Clean up time    \"While\" need not introduce a clause    Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page    External links modified   

Replaced page after deletion
PREVIOUS: IntroNEXT: [[Talk:While?section=_Utter_nonsense_interpretation_of_The_Times_and_The_Guardian_style_guides_| Utter nonsense interpretation of The Times and The Guardian style guides ]]
<<[[Talk:While?section=_Utter_nonsense_interpretation_of_The_Times_and_The_Guardian_style_guides_|>>]]