Replaced page after deletion::While
::concepts
Whilst::while Style::article Small::special English::while Which::would Should::archaic
Replaced page after deletion
Someone deleted this page, which has been stable for over seven years. Such a deletion warrants a consensus via poll. The information covered here is not in Wiktionary. At the very least, the page should be migrated to a While vs. Whilst page if the consensus is that that information predominates the section. Shiggity (talk) 22:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- There is no encyclopedic knowledge here, it's all about the term, when the term 'should' and shouldn't be used, it's pure dictionary land. Encyclopedic knowledge starts where terminology stops. - BigBodBad (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:While sections
Intro [[Talk:While?section=_Utter_nonsense_interpretation_of_The_Times_and_The_Guardian_style_guides_| Utter nonsense interpretation of The Times and The Guardian style guides ]] Multiple Choice Usage My idiolect \"While and whilst\" section Use of \"while\" to mean \"until\" The English/American conflict a different angle Replaced page after deletion Thee and Thou Sources & anti-whilst snobbery Clean up time \"While\" need not introduce a clause Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page External links modified
Replaced page after deletion | |
PREVIOUS: Intro | NEXT: [[Talk:While?section=_Utter_nonsense_interpretation_of_The_Times_and_The_Guardian_style_guides_| Utter nonsense interpretation of The Times and The Guardian style guides ]] |
<< | [[Talk:While?section=_Utter_nonsense_interpretation_of_The_Times_and_The_Guardian_style_guides_|>>]] |