Ugly Tables?::Korean martial arts


Korean::martial    Japanese::korea    Article::small    Argument::style    Shinra::system    Jujutsu::japan

Ugly Tables? I dunno, but I thought the page looked better before adding tables (various reasons). Anyone else want to revert? (Also, the page content seems to be of a strong POV type, too...)

Edededed 01:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I would agree that the table doesn't add much, at least in its current form. -- Visviva 07:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Not only that, the descriptions for each style stink! Soobakdo is a "peasant style?" Tangsoodo is "just like Shaolin?" It always makes me sad to see articles degrade like this... (Add weeping sounds, please) Anyone want to fix them up?

Edededed 06:46, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

The tables are terrible. Contradictory with no attempt to differentiate the notable from the trivial. I suggest we remove the Table entirely.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Actually I propose moving the Table to a Temp page so that the information can be accessed and incorporated into the article - and then we can delete the Temp page after some time. Tables - especially this sort are generally discouraged in Wikipedia. They are just another form of Lists.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

The table was moved to User talk:PRehse/Korean martial arts/Temp where it is rapidly being reduced as the information is being incorporated into the article.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Korean martial arts sections
Intro   Korean original forms of martial arts    Dubious content   National origin \"arguments\"  Modern Korean martial arts   Hanja    Subak    Ugly Tables?   [[Talk:Korean_martial_arts?section=_Could_Hwarang_[The_Pure_form_from_Silla]]_| Could Hwarang [The Pure form from Silla]] ]]  Fan martial Arts   Assistance required    Main image   

Ugly Tables?
PREVIOUS: IntroNEXT: Korean original forms of martial arts