Information for "Dignity"

Basic information

Display titleDignity
Default sort keyDignity
Page length (in bytes)39,474
Page ID234393
Page content languageEnglish


Moral, ethical, legal, and political discussions use the concept of dignity to express the idea that a being has an innate right to be valued, respected, and to receive ethical treatment. In the modern context dignity can function as an extension of the Enlightenment-era concepts of inherent, inalienable rights. English-speakers often use the word "dignity" in proscriptive and cautionary ways: for example in politics it can be used to critique the treatment of oppressed and vulnerable groups and peoples, but it has also been applied to cultures and sub-cultures, to religious beliefs and ideals, to animals used for food or research, and to plants. "Dignity" also has descriptive meanings pertaining to human worth, although there is no exact or agreed-upon definition of this worth. In general, the term has various functions and meanings depending on how the term is used and on the context.<ref name="Shultziner, D. Human Dignity - Functions and Meanings. Global Jurist">{{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}</ref>

The English word "dignity", attested from the early 13th century, comes from Latin dignitas (worthiness)<ref> {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }} </ref> by way of French dignité.<ref name = "DIC">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In ordinary modern usage it denotes "respect" and "status", and it is often used to suggest that someone is not receiving a proper degree of respect, or even that they are failing to treat themselves with proper self-respect. There is also a long history of special philosophical use of this term. However, it is rarely defined outright in political, legal, and scientific discussions. International proclamations have thus far left dignity undefined,<ref> "Those provisions concerning human dignity have not been authoritatively interpreted or applied by any of the competent, independent, international institutions." Bartha Maria Knoppers, Human Dignity and Genetic Heritage: Study Paper (Law Reform Commission of Canada, 1991), note, at 23. None of the international proclamations make dignity the rare quality that some commentators say it should be. </ref><ref> Myres S. McDougal, Harold D. Lasswell, and Lung-chu Chen, Human Rights and World Public Order: The Basic Policies of an International Law of Human Dignity (New Haven: Yale UP, 1980), note, at 376. </ref> and scientific commentators, such as those arguing against genetic research and algeny, cite dignity as a reason but are ambiguous about its application.<ref> {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=book }} </ref>

Dignity sections
Intro   Violations   Philosophical history  Religion  Proclamations and conventions  Medicine  Law  See also  References  Further reading  

PREVIOUS: IntroNEXT: Violations
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of views135
Number of redirects to this page1

Page protection

EditAllow all users
MoveAllow all users

Edit history

Page creatorBgwhite (Talk | contribs)
Date of page creation21:30, 26 October 2015
Latest editorBgwhite (Talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit21:30, 26 October 2015
Total number of edits1
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 91 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0